Advertisement

11.11.2008 at 11:48PM PST, ID: 23897254
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.2

How Was First Compiler Invented? How Machine Could Read First Compiler? What Was There Before Compilers?

Asked by F-J-K in Kernel And Operating System Specific Programming, Processor Programming for Specific Platforms, Theory

Tags:

I'm wondering, if compilers are written in human readable way, then how come the machine could read the compiler?

If machine could read the compiler - which is by itself is not a machine language, why don't the machine just read the high level programming language directly? As it is known, machine only can understand in binaries. If the compiler was written in binaries, in such a way that these binaries can fetch the high level language and translate it back to machine language, it would make more sense, but compilers are not in binaries, so there should be something else.

If a language needs a compiler, then how come a compiler is invented, since this compiler is a language and it will a compiler, see its confusing now!

I'm sure there are experts here who knows the answer. Waiting your reply.Start Free Trial
 
Loading Advertisement...
 
[+][-]11.12.2008 at 02:42PM PST, ID: 22945183

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]11.13.2008 at 12:18AM PST, ID: 22947878

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Kernel And Operating System Specific Programming, Processor Programming for Specific Platforms, Theory
Tags: compilers low level language machine language computer history
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: zstapic
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_2_20070628