Advertisement

07.04.2008 at 09:57AM PDT, ID: 23539756
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.6

Microsoft Cluster Server disk question

Asked by hscdsb in Microsoft Server

Tags: , ,

I need some clarificaton about microsoft cluster server.
I am looking at setting up an active/passive cluster to host SQL 2005.
I am going to use either 2003 or 2008 datacenter.
We have a SAN but were not planning on using it to hose the shared array.
Each of the two servers have 6 76GB drives which will provide enough storage with RAID 5, the servers
have 2 NICS and a fibre card each.

My first though is to  setup iSCSI for one RAID 5 array over the fibre cards leaving one nic for the heartbeat and once nic for public traffic.  The problem I see with this is that I now have a set of drives in one server doing nothing and I don't have true failover because the shared disk array is housed by one of the nodes.

Am I understanding this correctly?  Is is possible to mirror the RAID 5 arrays in each of the nodes and have true failover or must I put my data and quorum partitions on our SAN ?

We are currently using an old product called LEGATO co-standby server which I believe is real time replicating data between two raid arrays in the servers over fibre.  Can microsoft cluster server behave the same way so I can leverage my local drives in the servers?Start Free Trial
[+][-]07.05.2008 at 01:23AM PDT, ID: 21936313

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07.09.2008 at 04:55AM PDT, ID: 21962503

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07.09.2008 at 06:43AM PDT, ID: 21963444

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zone: Microsoft Server
Tags: Microsoft, Cluster Server, 2003-2008
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: rodriguesp
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: B
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628