Advertisement

08.04.2008 at 08:45AM PDT, ID: 23619390
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.8

Data Integrity in an SQL database

Asked by const71 in PostgreSQL Database, Oracle Database, SQL Query Syntax

Tags:

I would like to know in as much detail as possible an effective means of ensuring data integrity between a parent record and its associated child rows. For example:

I have a SALESORDER table
I have a SALESORDERITEM table

I want to ensure that before I apply a save to one SALESORDER record, another user has not modified the same record. I can do this quite easily with optimitic locking:
UPDATE SALESORDER SET TS = @newTS WHERE PK = @PK and TS = @oldTS

I also want to ensure before I apply a save to the same SALESORDER record, the COUNT of all associated SALEORDERITEM rows is the same as it was when the SALESORDER was retrieved in the application.

I also want to ensure before I apply a save to the same SALESORDER record, the TS of each SALEORDERITEM record has not changed. (There may be pending updates to an item not yet committed
so simply SELECTING won't work as these changes would not be visible in the SALESORDER transaction)

And finally, I also want to ensure before I apply a save to any one SALEORDERITEM associated to the single SALESORDER, the SALESORDER has not changed.

My concerns are performance (as these are OLTP functions that must run quick). I don't want deadlocks occuring or keep them limited and the solution is guaranteed safe for data integrity given the above constraints...   Thanks!
Start Free Trial
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:16AM PDT, ID: 22153678

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:18AM PDT, ID: 22153692

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:18AM PDT, ID: 22153695

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:39AM PDT, ID: 22153882

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:51AM PDT, ID: 22153970

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 09:54AM PDT, ID: 22153987

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 10:42AM PDT, ID: 22154380

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.04.2008 at 11:08AM PDT, ID: 22154600

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.22.2008 at 02:17PM PDT, ID: 22294167

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: PostgreSQL Database, Oracle Database, SQL Query Syntax
Tags: SQL
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: grant300
Participating Experts: 3
Solution Grade: B
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628