|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
|
[x]
The Solution Rating System
|
|
| With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating. - The Grade of the Solution
- The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
- The Number of Author and Expert Comments
- The Number of Experts Contributing
- The Feedback of the Community
Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site. If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Asked by harmomelodic in SQL Query Syntax, PL / SQL, Access Coding/Macros
I am trying to create a query where I only count members where none of the multiple entries for a particular ID contain a 1 in the field "statustype2". If there is a 1 in any of them, the ID is not counted, otherwise, it is counted once.
I know I still need a DISTINCT subclause (Access won't allow it in the count(), but that is not my primary concern. My primary concern is that the HAVING clause is eliminating almost all the data where inspection shows me it should not. Without the HAVING clause it appears to work as expected!
Keep in mind, Access also does not allow the more typical...
max(CASE WHEN statustype1 = '1' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0
Which is why I am using IIf()
Any help is appreciated.
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
|
SELECT statustype1, COUNT(ID) AS subtotal
FROM (
SELECT ID, statustype1, statustype2 FROM t1
UNION ALL
SELECT ID, statustype1, statustype2x FROM t2
) AS d
GROUP BY statustype1
HAVING 0 = MAX(IIf([statustype2 = '1', 1, 0))
|
20091028-EE-VQP-86 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625
